Why amd processors are cheaper than intel. Are the best processors Intel? (not anymore). Main parameters and features

Behind everything you do on your PC. That's why you need to find the right processor to suit your specific needs. Don't pay for features you don't need, don't buy a processor that won't do what you need.

If you've been caught up in the hectic war between AMD and Intel as closely as we have, you probably already know that AMD and Intel are targeting different parts of the processor market. Intel is focusing on higher clock speeds and efficiency while sticking with fewer cores. However, AMD is outmaneuvering the competition by offering more processor cores to ensure maximum multi-threaded performance.

Then it shouldn't surprise you that AMD had a great year in 2017 with Ryzen processors, especially its high-end processors. And now that the second-generation Ryzen processors have been released, it looks like 2018 will be another banner year for AMD - especially if AMD continues to release quality processors and .

Even in the shadow of the damaging excesses of Meltdown and Specter with Intel processors - which have been corrected - Intel is still growing steadily in categories outside of PC processors, which shows how much of an impact AMD's Ryzen processors have had on the market.

Luckily, Intel has released a ton of new processors, including the highly anticipated , as well as a number of low-end T-series desktop processors. That's not all, we're expecting Cannon Lake processors in 2019, just recently.

AMD also has its own issues to address as Israeli security lab CTS issued its press release detailing vulnerabilities in current AMD processors. However, AMD quickly responded, promising that they would fix these problems as soon as possible.

However, it's possible that AMD and Intel could coexist while serving completely different audiences, but in some places they would be in direct competition. If you're not entirely sure which side your loyalties fall on, below you'll find out all the details of the AMD vs Intel standoff in the processor market.

| AMDVSINTEL: PRICE

The best deals were supposed to be on AMD processors, which are known to be cheaper, but that's only because Red Team has done a lot of work at the entry level.

Now that Ryzen processors have proven that AMD can step up to the high-end stage, the market has changed. Intel is now a leader in budget segment processors, and its $64 (about RUR 4,000) Pentium G4560 processor has much better performance than the AMD A12-9800 (about RUR 6,500).

—
Even among the current generation of chips, Intel holds a dominant position, offering 8th generation Coffe Lake processors for only $117 (7,000 rubles) for the Core i3-8100T.

This is largely due to Advanced Micro Device's reluctance to go beyond simply repeating the outdated Bulldozer architecture in favor of introducing the Zen standard, which is already represented by more expensive processors.

However, in the inexpensive segment Intel processors and AMD usually sell for a similar price. Then you cross the threshold of 12,000 rubles, where things get more complicated. Intel's high-end processors now have between 4 and 18 cores, while AMD can offer up to 16 cores.

And, thanks to a recent price cut, you can find the AMD Ryzen 5 2400G and Ryzen 3 2200G for $160 and $105, respectively.

And while it has long been known that AMD Ryzen processors will offer the highest performance at a lower price, tests have shown that Intel remains competitive.

If you can find them, they'll cost $359 RRP, while the less capable Ryzen 7 1800X costs $299 RRP.

With this in mind, the price central processing units constantly fluctuates. Wait a few months, and you will find that the one you were eyeing has fallen significantly below the market price.

| AMDVSINTEL: PERFORMANCE

It was easier before. Did you want better performance? You just chose Intel, but now it's not that simple.

The Santa Clara-based manufacturer is consistent in benchmark tests, but Intel's processors also consume less heat, offer a blessedly low TDP, and are generally excellent across the board.

This is largely due to Intel's introduction of superthreads, which have been included in the company's processors since 2002. Hyperthreads keep existing cores active, preventing them from remaining unproductive.

And while AMD's simultaneous multi-threading (SMT) introduced in Ryzen is broadly similar to hyperthreading, Intel remains on top when it comes to pure clock speeds. AMD, on the other hand, is looking to add more cores to its processors, but has only recently gotten its head around clock speeds.

Unfortunately, software should be written with this multi-core advantage in mind, which explains why Intel continues to lead the way in real-world applications.

Fortunately, despite AMD's reputation for being hot, the new Ryzens have much lower TDP (thermal design point) ratings than AMD FX processors and APUs of the past. As long as you use a decent cooler, you won't have to worry about your Ryzen PC going up in flames. However, with the recently announced Intel T-Series desktop processors, AMD is in competition when it comes to TDP ratings.

The situation is the same as in the mobile sector (laptops), where AMD has only recently entered. The flagship Ryzen 7 2700U (4-core, 2.2 GHz - 3.8 GHz) looks very promising compared to the Intel Core i7-8550U (4-core, 1.8 GHz - 4.0 GHz).

And now that we've had a chance to test the Ryzen 7 2700X, AMD seems much more attractive to us when it comes to pure performance, but in real-world benchmarks Intel comes out ahead.

Featuring AMD RX Vega GL and GH GPUs to complement Intel Kaby Lake G processors with the newest generation NUC, at this stage the competition between AMD and Intel reaches a dead end. At this stage, the two companies are collaborating in a way we have never seen before. Moreover, both companies benefit from cooperation.

It is unclear how long the partnership will last. Since AMD recently launched its and , you can now only get "discrete-class" graphics from AMD chips, which will inevitably lead to more Ryzen-based laptops. Meanwhile, Intel poached two important team leaders AMD Radeon Graphics, so it seems inevitable that the company will move into the discrete graphics world.

| AMDVSINTEL: GRAPHICS

If you're building a gaming PC, frankly, you should be using a discrete graphics card instead of relying on the processor's integrated graphics to run demanding games like Middle Earth: Shadow of War.

However, built-in GPU Can run less demanding games. In this area, AMD is the clear leader, thanks to the latest Ryzen 5 2400G, which includes graphics system Vega, rapidly surpassing Intel's integrated graphics technologies.

However, as we mentioned earlier, Intel has officially started shipping its high-end H-series mobile chips with AMD graphics on board. In turn, this means that powerful laptops Intel based, will now be able to become thinner, and their silicon platform will be 50% smaller, according to the vice president of Intel's computing group, Christopher Walker.

This is all achieved through Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB) technology, an inventive new architecture that allows performance sharing between Intel processors and third-party graphics chips with dedicated graphics memory. However, it is still too early to say whether the processor will be the best solution regarding a purebred AMD laptop slated for release later this year.

However, if all you want is to play League of Legends on modest graphics settings or relive your childhood with a full disk of emulators (that's okay, we won't tell), the latest Intel Kaby Lake. Coffee Lake or AMD APU A series for desktop computers, will most likely be the same as any upcoming device as a mobile graphics solution.

At a high graphics level, such as when you're looking to pair CPU power with a powerful AMD or Nvidia graphics card, Intel processors tend to be much better for gaming due to their high and stable base clocks. At the same time, AMD provides advanced processors for multitasking as a result of increasing their number of cores and threads.

While there's no clear winner in the graphics department, the survey says AMD is the best option in the integrated graphics department, while hardcore gamers who don't want to spend extra money on a graphics card will find Intel better suited for solo gaming. Meanwhile, AMD is superior in several ways.

| AMDVSINTEL: OVERCALLING

When you buy new computer or even a separate central processor, it is locked at a certain clock speed, as indicated on the packaging. Some processors come with unlocked clock speeds, meaning they may have a higher clock speed than the manufacturer's recommendation, giving the user more control over how they use their components (though you must know how to overclock to do this).

AMD turned out to be more generous than Intel in this regard. With an AMD system, you can expect overclocking capabilities starting at $129 (RUB 7,800). Meanwhile, you'll only be able to overclock an Intel processor if it's adorned with the K-series seal of approval. Again, the cheapest processor in this category is $149 (RUR 9,000) for the Intel Core i3-7350K.

—
Both companies will void your warranty if you burn out the CPU from overclocking, though, so it's important to keep an eye on the temperature. Excessive heat can be generated if you are not careful, thereby destroying your processor. Keep in mind that you'll miss out on several hundred megahertz if you skip one of the K models.

Even more extravagant chipsets other than the K-series are also impressive. For example, the i7-8700K is capable of maintaining a Turbo frequency of 4.7 GHz compared to the 4.2 GHz boost clock of the Ryzen 7 1800X. If you have access to liquid nitrogen cooling, you can reach up to 6.1GHz with the monster 18-core Intel I9-7980XE.

| AMD VS INTEL: AVAILABILITY AND SUPPORT

Ultimately, the biggest problem with AMD desktop processors is their lack of compatibility with other components. In particular, the sizes motherboard and coolers are limited as a result of socket differences between AMD/Intel chips.

While many CPU coolers require you to use a special AM4 mount for use with Ryzen, only one is compatible with the AM4 chipset. Due to this, Intel's pricing is much more commonplace and often comes with lower upfront costs, as a result of its wide selection of chipsets.

However, AMD chips make a little more sense from a hardware design perspective. WITH motherboard AMD, you will not find metal socket pins on the processor socket, you will notice that these pins are located on the base of the processor itself. In turn, the likelihood of a failure due to broken contacts is significantly lower.

In terms of availability, four months after the release date of Intel 8th generation processors, both processors Intel Coffee Lake and AMD Ryzen are widely available from retailers. While graphics cards are seeing limited availability in stores due to the cryptocurrency boom, most processors can be found at or below their price tags.

These include everything from the Intel Core i7-8700K to the recently released AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Ryzen 5 2400G. Even Intel's recently announced 8th generation T-Series processors should be available for sale online any minute. Now we just have to wait for the 2nd generation Ryzen processors to freshen up the market again.

Hello. Today we will think about what is better. I'll probably start with the fact that our desktop computers, laptops, and netbooks are built on one of these technologies, companies. That is, they work on processors produced by the company Intel or AMD. These two large companies can be said to make the difference in the world of computer technology. I think you understand what I mean. Before buying a computer, everyone probably thinks about which platform to choose, what will be more affordable and how this will affect the quality and duration of the computer. These are the questions I will try to understand. Let's consider two options:

Intel is better than AMD

In the first case, I want to tell you what is good about Intel processors and why they are the ones. Well Intel company this is the undisputed leader in the computer field, someone may disagree with me, but it still seems to me that this is so. For example, a dedicated server hosting company uses Intel processors in its servers. First, I will write the pros and cons that are already taken into account when choosing processors from Intel and AMD.

pros

• Intel creates standards and this is more true than not
• Intel processors work more stable and much longer
• These processors have lower heat dissipation (they heat up less)
• They work faster than AMD processors, even at a lower frequency.

Minuses

• Intel processors are about 20% more expensive than AMD
• They lose to AMD processors in games and when working with graphics.

I would like to note that the points written above were not invented by me, these are the main pros and cons that are circulating on the Internet. You will see my opinion at the end of the article. Now it's the other way around...

AMD is better than Intel

Of course, AMD processors have their advantages and disadvantages. In fact, it is generally accepted that AMD is worse than Intel, but many will disagree with this, and rightly so. Now point by point:

pros

• Price, they are cheaper than Intel and this good way save money when buying a computer. This is the biggest plus.

Minuses

• They break down more often and get hotter
• They work slower than similar Intel processors (questionable).

Here are a few points about AMD processors. I did not delve into all sorts of incomprehensible terms, but tried to write in such a way that everyone could understand the essence and choose a suitable platform for their computer.

My opinion on “Intel or AMD”

I want to say this: if you buy an AMD processor and save money, this does not mean that it will burn out in a few months. And if you choose Intel, then it will not work as much and several times faster. I think that regular user won't notice any difference between Intel and AMD. Both the first and second brands have their pros and cons, and that’s how it should be. I will not recommend one of the processors to you, because each of them is good in its own way. I think you understand what I wanted to tell you in this article. If you have any questions, ask them in the comments. Good luck!

• 1. A little history
• 2. Pricing policy
• 3. Overclocking options
• 4. Processor for computer games
• 5. Final instructions

Every computer, no matter how it is used, is made up of identical basic components. The main element in any PC is the processor, which performs all computing operations, and the performance of this small part determines the performance of the system as a whole. Only two companies are fighting for leadership in the processor market, which we will talk about today and try to answer the age-old question - AMD or Intel, which is better?

A little history

Both companies began their journey in an era when computers occupied entire rooms, and the concept of a personal computer was just beginning to come into fashion. The first in this field was Intel, created in 1968 and becoming practically the only developer and manufacturer of processes. The brand's original products were integrated circuits, but pretty soon the manufacturer focused only on processors. AMD was founded in 1969 and was initially aimed at the process market.

At that time, AMD processors became a product that appeared through active cooperation between two manufacturers. Intel's technical department supported the young competitor in every possible way and shared technologies and patents. After the company firmly found its feet, the manufacturers' paths diverged in different directions, and today the two global manufacturers collide with each other in every generation of processors.

Price policy

There are many solutions on the market, both from one manufacturer and from another. Taking the side of one company and completely abandoning the other is not so easy, because when choosing a processor you need to take into account many factors. To begin with, it is worth noting that both companies produce processors for all applications and for any budget:

• Office. Such processors have minimal technical characteristics and low cost, are designed to run office applications and are not designed for programs with high computing needs.
• Homemade. This type of process is usually more powerful than the office version, since it provides a performance reserve for casual gaming, but the cost of such an element is much higher.
• Gaming or professional. Computer games place certain demands on CPU power, and such a processor will cost a pretty penny.

If you are selecting a processor for work, then AMD offers inexpensive options for “stones” with good technical performance. The budget line from the manufacturer is characterized by low cost, excellent performance and reasonable energy consumption. However, Intel products, according to all experts, have a much higher power reserve. Thus, an AMD processor is excellent for a budget computer, but for work in resource-intensive applications, gaming and stable system operation in general, it is better to opt for Intel.

Overclocking options

Overclocking is a fairly popular way to increase the performance of a computer without the need to purchase additional hardware. However, for full overclocking, the processor must have a certain architecture and meet specific requirements.

If an Intel processor is better for gaming, then it is recommended to purchase an AMD processor for overclocking. Unlike its competitor, AMD has created processors that can operate at different clock speeds, which provides ample overclocking options. At the same time, you can overclock any processor from the line, but Intel allows you to experiment only with some models with the K index in the name. Other processors simply do not support overclocking and cannot change the clock speed.

For those who plan to overclock a PC platform, it is better to purchase AMD, which operates stably at any frequency. At the same time, this effect is supported by both expensive eight-core processors and budget options.

Processor for computer games

Fans of clear graphics definitely choose Intel Core i5 and i7. The latest models from this manufacturer have shown high performance in the most “heavy” games and do an excellent job of visualizing any picture. Such processors belong to the gaming category.

However, AMD is not giving up its position so easily. Not long ago, a solution appeared that is perfect for budget gaming computer— six-core Ryzen 5 chipsets. The result is an inexpensive and quite productive working platform. Although the verdict still adheres to Intel products, which are recognized as the best solution for a gaming computer.

One of the main factors when choosing a processor for gaming is its energy efficiency. Traditionally, Intel processors are better optimized both in terms of power consumption and operating temperatures. Therefore, if you do not want your computer to “heat up like a stove,” it is better to join the blue camp, or save on the processor and take AMD, but buy additional powerful system cooling.

Final instructions

In 2019, both companies will introduce a new generation of processors that will have more advanced characteristics. On this moment, best choice For home computer In terms of price/quality ratio, there are two processors - Intel Core i5 and AMD Ryzen 5 1600.

Both stones have approximately the same parameters, but there are several very obvious differences:

• Both stones have the same number of cores, but in the case of AMD there is the notorious possibility of fairly simple overclocking. Therefore, it will be better suited for the future, and Intel will work more stable.
• Specific format random access memory. An AMD processor reaches its full potential if it has a certain RAM frequency, which can create some difficulties. The Intel processor is much more interesting in this regard, because it does not create such strict restrictions.
• An Intel processor heats up much less, meaning you don’t have to spend additional money on organizing a cooling system. AMD gets quite hot and you will have to purchase a powerful cooler for it.

In any case, offers from all manufacturers have their own advantages and are tailored to meet specific tasks. If you are forced to stick to a strict budget, AMD offers an excellent line of inexpensive processors. In the case when you want to build a computer that can cope with any task, then Intel products have not yet been developed better for this purpose.

Question: what processor? better than AMD or Intel, does not have a definite answer, because each component has a number of specific parameters and the choice of one or another option should be based on the purpose of the PC itself. An effective platform will demonstrate high performance only with the correct selection of all components that will enhance each other's performance.

The processor industry does not stand still, and, in principle, neither does information Technology generally. Over the past fifteen years, humanity has achieved a revolutionary breakthrough in the computer field. As for processors, today developers present us with a huge selection of their products with the latest micro architectures and technologies. We just have to adapt to our financial capabilities. When buying a computer, the question arises: which processor to choose AMD or Intel?

In this article I will try to reveal the answer to a frequently asked question, based not on personal preferences, but only on facts and examples. Anyone can support my opinion or refute it. So, if you're ready, let's go.

Let's go back in time a little. Two companies, Advanced Micro Devices and Intel Corporation, were created in 1969 and 1968. Just imagine, both megacorporations have almost half a century of experience in creating central processors. These two sides have been competing with each other since their founding and this is not surprising. With all this, no matter what, the two companies are on par with each other. However, among ordinary users the name Intel is better known, for some reason, than AMD. At that time, processors were created with a clock frequency of 3 Megahertz and an 8-bit bus. We are interested in modern processors with higher parameters.

Tales of AMD

Friends, many of you have probably heard myths about “hot” and “not overclockable” AMD processors. Today it is stupid to say that AMD overheats or does not overclock, because this statement is based on ordinary rumors. Yes, in the 2000s, processors like the Athlon 1400 got hot, and if the cooler failed, they burned out. But now it’s the beginning of 2016 and modern AMD processors are equipped with good thermal protection.

Do not forget that the thermal regime, in addition to the central processor itself, can be influenced by various factors:
- poor quality applying thermal paste;
- debris in the cooling cooler;
- presence of a large amount of dust;
- faulty power supply, etc.

As for overclocking. Today, some AMD processors set world records for overclocking, so the opinion that they “cannot be overclocked” is no longer relevant. There are also processors of the “Black Edition” series, in which the possibility of overclocking is already provided by the manufacturer.

So, with the fables about AMD processors, I think it's clear. Now a few words about Intel. I personally have not heard any negative reviews for these processors. Back when the Athlons were “baked”, for Intel Pentium responded quite positively. Remember, the phrase “What kind of stump do you have?” was still in circulation, that is, Pentium, and those who had Pentium-4 were generally cool.

Intel vs AMD battle of the titans

To be honest, there is no specific universal answer to the question “which is better than intel or amd”, since each user has his own needs, because a simple “user” needs one thing, and an experienced gamer needs something completely different. Each company releases new generation processors almost every year. Today Intel can lead by releasing processors with a modified architecture, and tomorrow, for example, AMD will release a new generation architecture, taking first place. There have been and will be “fights” between the two corporations, and this is not surprising, because each of them wants to attract the attention of users with its central processors with individual unique features.

In the processor industry, there is such a pattern: the more expensive a product within one manufacturer, the more powerful, better and faster it is. However AMD processor s, as a rule, have always been cheaper than products from Intel. For myself personally, I came to the conclusion: if you don’t have enough money or don’t have enough money, take AMD; if finances are not a problem, then take Intel. For the latter you will pay more money and get a slightly better product. As for reliability, both products cannot break, like, for example, a monitor or a hard drive, and will last for many years, provided that they are not subject to constant overclocking.

Pros and cons of AMD and Intel

AMD processors
Pros:
- ideal performance/price ratio;
- affordable price for all segments of the population;
- the ability to control the voltage in the microprocessor cores;
- almost any AMD processor accelerates up to 20%;
- multitasking (you can easily work in several demanding programs and not notice the strain on your computer);
- AMD's multiplatform makes it possible to replace old processors with new ones without changing the motherboard. Competitors lag significantly behind in this regard.

Minuses:
- significantly high energy consumption;
- applications created for Intel do not work well on AMD computers;
- within the “FX” series, a native cooler (standard) is not enough; a more powerful cooling system is needed;
- performance in computer games is slightly worse than that of Intel, however, there is a significant difference in price.

Intel processors
Pros:
- good performance when working in a resource-intensive program, provided that it is running alone (converters, archivers, photo and video editors, games, etc.);
- gaming performance is higher than that of competitors, but not significantly;
- work with RAM is better than that of AMD processors;
- energy consumption is lower;
- a large number of games and programs are optimized for Intel stones;

Minuses:
- Intel processors perform poorly when running two powerful programs;
- exorbitant price;
- when it appears new line processors, then both the motherboard and other components must be replaced;
- processors with the letter “K” heat up significantly, so you need to install good cooling for them;
- from the previous paragraph it follows that upgrading your computer will lead to significant costs, since you will have to purchase not only a processor.

From the positives and negatives of the two leaders AMD and Intel, it is difficult to say which one ranks 1st. Each processor has its own characteristics and is good in its own way.

Test of Core i7-3770K and FX-8350 processors

To test the two giants in practice, I took two processors for the test:
- from AMD processor on the new FX-8350 architecture (Vishera, 8 MB level 3 cache, AM3+ socket, 4.0 GHz, overclocked to 4.4 GHz);
- Intel processor Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge, 8 MB level 3 cache, 3.5 GHz, overclocked to 4.4 GHz).
To make everything fair, when testing these processors, the motherboard was taken Asus board Sabertooth. By the way, the product from Intel is more expensive.

Test results:

From the tests we can draw a conclusion. The AMD processor has an acceptable cost and is sufficient good performance, however, it consumes more electricity. The competitor has low power consumption and is superior in performance. But at the same time, the price for Intel is much higher.

As I already said, each processor from both giants has its own characteristics, disadvantages and advantages. Personally, I would choose an AMD processor, and with the remaining money I would buy a solid cooling system or add some more money and replace the video card. But, if money is not a problem, then buy Intel. That's all, friends!

This issue is also covered here

This material will compare the processor products of two leading manufacturers of semiconductor chips: Intel vs AMD. Their current computing platforms will also be reviewed, their strengths and weaknesses indicated. Well, in addition to this, possible computer configurations will be given.

The main current x86 processor sockets

Today, each of the leading manufacturers of central processors has 2 current processor sockets. At Intel it is:

Socket LGA 2011-v3. This combined processor socket is targeted at both high-performance personal computers for computer enthusiasts and servers alike. The key feature of this platform is the RAM controller, which can operate in 4-channel mode, and it is this important feature that provides unprecedented performance to processor products. It should also be noted that this platform does not use an integrated graphics subsystem. Only discrete graphics can unlock the potential of such high-performance chips, and specifically for the use of this class computer components and oriented processor socket LGA 2011 - v3.

Socket LGA 1151. This computing platform allows you to organize both budget-level PCs and high-performance computing systems. In this case, the RAM controller can operate maximally in 2-channel mode. Also, almost every central processor in LGA 1151 is equipped with an integrated video card that will fit perfectly into an office or budget system unit. In terms of performance, this socket is inferior to the previously reviewed LGA 2011-v3, but outperforms any of the AMD solutions. Therefore, if we compare Intel i5 vs AMD FX-8XXX, then the advantage, both in productivity and in energy efficiency, will be with the products of the first company.

In turn, AMD is actively promoting the following processor sockets today:

The main computing platform for this developer microprocessor devices- this is AM3+. The most productive CPUs within its framework are FX chips, which can include from 4 to 8 computing modules. The RAM controller in AM3+, as in LGA 1151, can function maximally in Only in this case we're talking about about support for the outdated RAM standard - DDR3, but LGA 1151 boasts support for the newest and fastest DDR4. Therefore, if we compare the latest Intel i5 vs AMD FX-9XXX, then even the flagship solutions of the latter will significantly lose in performance. Also within this platform there is support for an integrated graphics subsystem. But, unlike the sameLGA 1151The built-in graphics core in this case is part of the motherboard, and is not integrated into the semiconductor chip of the CPU.

The most recent AMD processor socket to date isFM2+. Its main niche is inexpensive multimedia stations, office or ultra-budget computers. main featureFM2+ -This is a very productive integrated subsystem that can compete on equal terms with discrete video cards in terms of performance. entry level and is significantly ahead of Intel's products of this class. But the limiting factor on the success of this socket is the weak processor part of this semiconductor solution. Therefore, the use of this connector in the context of even an entry-level is entirelyunjustified.

LGA 1151. Main characteristics

This computing platform currently occupies a dominant position in the market desktop computers, and it is this that provides a significant advantage in the comparison between Intel vs AMD on the former’s side. And both in quantitative and qualitative terms. As noted earlier, it boasts the following advantages over its direct competitors AM3+ and FM2+: a built-in DDR4 RAM controller, the mandatory presence of a graphics subsystem and cache memory, which includes three levels without fail. The positioning of chips within LGA 1151, as well as their most important parameters, are shown in Table 1. If we make a direct comparison between Intel Core i5 vs AMD FX-9 XXX series, then in the vast majority of tasks the advantage will be with the first solution. There is nothing special about this: the latest generation of Intel chips was introduced in the summer of 2015, and AMD in 2012. Therefore, it is quite difficult for the latter’s processor products to compete with newer and more productive Intel products.

Positioning of chips within LGA 1151. Their most important characteristics

Name of processors	In which PCs is it best to use such a chip?	Main settings
Celeron. CPU models G3920, G3900 and G3900TE.	Office system units with integrated graphics.	Advanced 14 nm process technology, excellent energy efficiency, three-level cache.
Pentium. Model series processors G44XX and G45XX.	Budget PCs that can handle most common tasks.	Compared to the most affordable Celeron chips Level 3 cache and clock speeds have been increased.
Core i3 models 61ХХ and 63ХХ.	Basic gaming PCs paired with powerful discrete graphics.	HT technology support, which allows you to get at the level With ofta 4 software processing streams. Increased L3 cache and clock speeds.
Core i5 models 64XX, 65XX and 66XX.	An average gaming system or graphics station combined with a powerful graphics card.	Full 4 cores, dynamic CPU frequency control, even larger cache size.
Core i7 models 67XX.	The most productive gaming PCs, video processing and encoding stations, entry-level servers.	4 cores and 8 software processing threads. Maximum size cache. Adjusting the processor frequency.
	System units for computer enthusiasts.	An unlocked multiplier allows you to significantly increase the speed of your computing system.

Processor socket LGA 2011-v3. Technical Specifications

Within this platform it is impossible to compare Intel vs AMD for the reason that this socket is unrivaled in performance today.LGA 2011-v3was originally developed as a server socket, but then the lineup chipsXeon was supplemented Core i7,aimed at the segment of household PCs with unprecedented high performance.As was previously noted earlier, one cannot expect integrated graphics within such systems, and the RAM controller has 4 channels at once. Also, the undeniable advantages of this socket include the ability to install a CPU with 6 or even 12 cores, which also haveunlockedfactor. As a result, the productivity margin of such computing systems allows their owners do not have to think about the requirements for hardware the next 3-4 years for sure. Intel vs AMD processors in context LGA 2011-v3comparison is unacceptable. There is simply a gap between them both in performance and in price. The latter for such PCs starts from several thousand dollars. But there is nothing special about this: such a PC is purchased several years in advance and has excessive performance.

Main parameters and features

It's not entirely correct to compare processors Intel solutions Core vs AMD FX.While the former are constantly updated and improved, the latter were released back in 2012 and since then there have been no changes within the AM3+ platform. As a result, the performance difference is simply huge.between these two platforms. AMD's flagship today can compete on equal terms only with the chips of the model rangeCore i3.All AM3+ processors have an unlocked multiplier, and, as a result, they can and should be overclocked. Under the most favorable circumstances, with such CPUs you can reach the 5 GHz bar. Also, this semiconductor crystal necessarily includes a 3-level cache. The RAM controller in this case is 2-channel, but, unlikeLGA 1151can't work with memoryDDR4 but only with DDR3.When compared with each other“ Core ” last generation, then the advantage of the latter in terms of performance will be very large.The approximate positioning of AM3+ chips in niches is given in the table below.

AM3+ chip positioning

Processor family name	Number of cores and modules	Purpose
FX-43XX	4/2	Budget and office PCs. Entry-level gaming systems.
FX-63XX	6/3	Mid-level gaming computers
FX-83XX	8/4	Graphics and workstations. Entry-level servers. The most productive gaming PCs within this platform.
FX-9XXX	8/4	Computers for enthusiasts.

Processor socket FM2+. The main platform for AMD hybrid chips

It is impossible to compare processor parts vs AMD A-series. These processors are aimed at solving completely different problems. The first of them allow you to create high-performance PCs, and the second - multimedia stations. But the situation changes dramatically when comparing graphics subsystems. Core i5, alas, cannot boast of a powerful integrated graphics subsystem, but the hybrid AMD chip by default it is equipped with a video card, which even surpasses even entry-level discrete accelerators in its capabilities. An important feature of this family of chips is that they are equipped only with a two-level cache memory.

Multimedia stations

Of course, within the niche of multimedia stations, it is possible to compare central processors such as Intel Core i5 vs AMD A10-ХХХХ, but this approach is not economically justified. Such computers place increased demands on the graphics subsystem, and are not so demanding on the processor part of the PC. It is precisely this combination of characteristics that the previously mentioned series of hybrid chips from AMD can boast of. Another important feature is their very low cost, which corresponds to 2-core CPU models from Intel. As a result, AMD occupies a dominant position in this highly specialized niche. The approximate configuration of such a PC is shown in the table below. The parameters of this computer will be quite sufficient for playing videos, listening to music, working in office applications, and even some toys will run on minimum settings.

Approximate configuration of a multimedia station

№ p/p	Name of components	Model	Cost, rubles
	CPU	A8-7850 3.6/3.9 GHz, 4 cores, 4 MB L2 cache.	5000 rubles
	Motherboard	MSI A78M-E35	3000 rubles
	RAM	TEAM 8 GB DDR3 1600 MHz	2000 rubles
	power unit	GameMax GM-500B	1200 rubles
	Frame	I-BOX FORCE 1807	900 rubles
	HDD	HDD 1 Tb 7200	2500 rubles
Total:			14600 rubles

Office computers

In this case, the comparison between AMD FX vs Intel will be on the side of the latter. It has very productive entry-level CPUs at very affordable prices. The Celeron chip will look most optimal within such a computing system. The approximate configuration of such a computer is given in the following table.

Office computer 2016

№p/p	PC component	Model	Approximate price, rubles
	CPU	Celeron G3900	2100 rubles
	Motherboard	ASUS H110M-R/C/SI	2400 rubles
	RAM	Silicon Power 4 GB DDR4 2133 MHz	1200 rubles
	power unit	Delux 400W FAN 120 mm	700 rubles
	Frame	Frime 165B	900 rubles
	HDD	WD WD1600AVVS, 160 GB	2200 rubles
Total:			9500 rubles

Entry-level gaming PCs

Theoretically, within the framework of an entry-level gaming PC, you can also compare, for example, AMD FX - 6300 vs Intel Core AI 3. But the difference in performance in this case will be simply fantastic. Moreover, the winner will be the second CPU, which has only 2 real modules for carrying out calculations instead of the one that has 6 paired blocks.

Therefore, in any case, the gaming system should be based on chips from Intel. They are more expensive, but their performance is significantly better. Well, for gaming systems, the number of displayed images per second comes first, and here the difference between AMD FX vs Intel i3 will be simply stunning. The approximate configuration of such a computer is shown in the table below.

Basic gaming system components

№ p/p	PC component	Model	Price, rubles
	CPU	i3-6100	6500 rubles
	Motherboard	ASUS H110M	2400 rubles
	RAM	2x 4 GB DDR4 2133 MHz	2400 rubles
	power unit	GameMax GM-500B	1200 rubles
	Frame	I-BOX FORCE 1805	900 rubles
	HDD	1Tb 7200	2 7 00 rubles
	Solid State Drive	128 GB SATA 3	2500 rubles
	Video card	Radeon RX460	7000 rubles
Total:			25,600 rubles

Average gaming systems

Comparing AMD FX-8350 vs Intel "Cor AI 5" even on a mid-level gaming PC in terms of the number of frames per second output, we get a significant difference. In some cases the difference will be 20-30 frames per second. This is unacceptable in dynamic games. Therefore, it is most correct to assemble a mid-level gaming system only on a full-fledged 4-core CPU from Intel. Moreover, it is best to look towards the i5-6600 chip. It is in combination with the GeForce 1060 that it will allow you to get excellent “Gameplay”. It should be noted that the video card must be equipped with 6GB of RAM. Also, installing processors with an unlocked multiplier in such a system is not entirely justified. They are aimed at the premium segment and to work in tandem with a more expensive and powerful video card. Otherwise, the approximate configuration is shown in the table below.

Mid-range gaming system

Component	Parameters, model	Price, rubles
CPU	i5-6600	15 000 rubles
Motherboard	ASUS In 150-M	6000 rubles
RAM	DDR4 3200MHz 16Gb	12000 rubles
power unit	1000W	7000 rubles
Frame	Midi-Tower	2000 rubles
HDD	2GB, 7200	6000 rubles
SSD drive	256GB	5500 rubles
Graphics accelerator	GeForce 1060, 6 GB	20 000 rubles
Total:		73,500 rubles

Uncompromising gaming PCs

If even when comparing Intel Core i5 vs AMD the undeniable advantage is already on the side of the first company, then in this case, in essence, the second company has no analogues. The premium CPU segment has been confidently occupied by the products of only one company for the last 5 years - Intel, and even AMD comparison FX-9590 vs Intel LGA 2011-v3 does not give the first company’s products any chance. As noted earlier, Core i7 processors for the LGA2011-v3 socket are aimed at this niche. They can include up to 10 computational units, have an increased amount of cache memory and an unlocked multiplier.

But the key difference in this case is the RAM controller, capable of operating in 4-channel mode. As a result, the RAM subsystem in this case is faster, and worthy competition for such computers does not yet exist.

PC for the computer enthusiast

Component	Characteristics	Price, rubles
CPU	Core i7-6950 X	100,000 rubles
Video card	8 GB	50,000 rubles
RAM	32 GB, DDR4	25 000 rubles
Motherboard	X99	45,000 rubles
power unit	1000 W	16,000 rubles
Frame	ATX	2000 rubles
HDD	2Gb, 7200	8,000 rubles
SSD drive	512 GB	10,000 rubles
Total:		256,000 rubles

Graphic stations

Even within this specialized niche, a comparison between AMD FX vs Intel Core i5 indicates that the first company's products are outdated and inferior in all respects. The base chip for such a PC is i5-6400.

The approximate configuration of such a system is given in the following table.

Graphics station equipment

№ p/p	Component	Model	Cost in rubles
	CPU	i5-6400	11 000 rubles
	Motherboard	ASUS Z-170DE	5400 rubles
	RAM	DDR4 16Gb	10,000 rubles
	power unit	Aerocool VX-800	5400 rubles
	Frame	Frime 165B	2000 rubles
	HDD	1Tb SATA 3, 7200, 64 Mb cache	40 00 rubles
	Solid State Drive	256 GB SATA 3	50 00 rubles
	Video card	Radeon Pro2DUO	120,000 rubles
Total:			162,800 rubles

What's next?

The next few months will be very busy in the processor market. First, in January, Intel will update its lineup of chips and present the 7th generation of its architecture, codenamed Core. No fundamental changes are expected in this case. We will work on bugs, slightly improve performance and add some new technologies. Then, towards the end of the first quarter, AMD will finally release its new socket, which it will call AM4. In this case, the changes will already be revolutionary in nature. The chips will be produced using a new technical process, have an improved architecture and will feature new technologies. It is these Zen processors that will, in theory, restore parity in the CPU market. Only after this will it be advisable to revise the previously given computer configurations.

Results

Let us summarize the comparison of Intel vs AMD processor products carried out within the framework of this material. The only niche where the second company’s position is still strong is multimedia systems and PCs for budget and office use. Moreover, in the second case, Intel products look even more preferable. Another advantage that AMD can boast of is the lower cost of its products. But is it worth saving the same $100 and getting an outdated system?even by today's standards. This is already obvious: a PC is bought for 3-5 years, so in all other cases, when buying a new computer system, it is more correct to focus on comparisonspecifically for the products of the second company.